Initial Rapid Needs Assessment โ€” Kaga & Damboa LGAs

Comprehensive humanitarian situation analysis covering 147 assessment sites and an estimated 893,000 people across CCCM, Food Security & Nutrition, Shelter, Health, and Gender & Protection sectors in Borno State.

147 Assessment Sites ~893,000 People Assessed Kaga LGA โ€” 78 sites Damboa LGA โ€” 69 sites Data: March 24, 2026
Population Assessed
~893,000
Across 147 sites, Borno State
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Sites โ€” Displacement Increasing
53%
78 of 147 sites still growing
๐Ÿ“ˆ
IDPs Without Shelter
8,947
Fully exposed, no shelter at all
โ›บ
Malaria Deaths (7 days)
197
628 cases ยท 31% case fatality rate
๐ŸฆŸ
Farmers Without Seeds
94%
2026 growing season at risk
๐ŸŒฑ
Sites Reporting GBV
74%
109 of 147 sites ยท forced marriage
โš ๏ธ
No Documentation
54%
Sites where households lack ID docs
๐Ÿ“‹
Sites: Fear Blocks Education
61
Joint #1 education barrier
๐Ÿ“š
๐Ÿ”ด
Active, deteriorating emergency โ€” not a recovery situation53% of sites report increasing IDP arrivals. Damboa LGA (~665,000 people, 69 sites) is the primary pressure point with 74% of its sites growing. Boko Haram-related civilian releases are still reported at 15 sites within the last 3 months.
๐Ÿ“Š Displacement trend by LGA
๐Ÿงฉ Population type at assessed sites
๐Ÿ” Site population status
๐Ÿšฆ Freedom of movement
๐Ÿ—๏ธ Infrastructure damage summary
Schools
48% partial ยท 7% destroyed
Hospitals
47% partial ยท 6% destroyed
Roads
49% partial ยท 5% destroyed
Boreholes
49% partial ยท 7% destroyed
Markets
48% partial ยท 6% destroyed
๐Ÿ“‹ Priority response matrix โ€” all sectors
Sector Key Finding Scale Urgency
Health Malaria CFR 31%; diarrhoea CFR 66% โ€” healthcare system collapse; 49% of facilities have <1 week drugs ~893,000 people Critical
Food Security 94% of farmers lack seeds for 2026 season; IDPs eating โ‰ค2 meals/day at 85% of sites 147 sites Critical
Shelter/NFI 8,947 IDPs with zero shelter; 99% of sites need NFI kits across all 5 categories 145 of 147 sites Critical
GBV / Protection Forced/early marriage at 74% of all sites; survival sex at 17%; 54% sites lack documentation 138 sites report GBV Critical
WASH Fecal contamination near water sources at 28% of sites; widespread open defecation 41 sites High
Education Fear of attack and lack of materials (61 sites each) are the joint top barriers to school attendance 63 sites: zero attendance High
Infrastructure ~48% partial damage; 6โ€“7% total destruction across all key facilities All 147 sites affected High
CCCM 71% spontaneous settlements with no formal site management 147 sites Medium
๐Ÿ•๏ธ

Camp Coordination & Camp Management (CCCM)

Site management, IDP population dynamics, host-community relations, movement and protection environment

Damboa Population
~665,000
69 sites ยท 74% of Damboa sites growing
Kaga Population
~228,000
78 sites ยท 35% of Kaga sites growing
Spontaneous Settlements
71%
No formal camp management present
Sites with Growing Population
53%
78 of 147 sites still increasing
๐Ÿ“ Population trajectory by LGA
๐Ÿ˜๏ธ Site type distribution
๐Ÿค Host-IDP community relations
โœ…
Relatively stable social cohesion โ€” a programming window for community-based protection before tensions escalate under resource pressure.
๐Ÿ”’ Key protection metrics
No documentation (sites)
54%
Movement restricted
47%
No psychosocial access
39%
Humanitarian access blocked
23%
Boko Haram releases (3mo)
15 sites
Population figures for Kaga and Damboa LGAs are estimates derived from 147 site-level records after correcting for data entry inconsistencies identified during quality review. Field verification of site-level population and household counts is recommended before procurement planning.
๐ŸŒพ

Food Security & Nutrition

Agricultural collapse, market access, meal frequency, and malnutrition service coverage

Farmers Without Seeds
94%
132 of 140 sites ยท 2026 season
Fields Not Prepared
79%
110 of 140 sites
IDP Sites: Only 1 Meal/Day
10%
12 of 118 IDP sites reporting
Sites Without CMAM
49%
72 of 147 sites ยท no SAM services
Breastfeeding Problems
75%
111 sites flag infant feeding issues
Malnutrition Screening
75%
110 sites with active screening
๐Ÿ”ด
Imminent 2026 agricultural collapseWith 94% of farmers lacking seeds and 79% not preparing fields, the 2026 harvest is at near-total risk. A harvest failure in Q3โ€“Q4 2026 will dramatically worsen already acute food insecurity for hundreds of thousands of people unless emergency seed distribution occurs before planting windows close.
โš ๏ธ
IYCF programme coverage cannot be reliably quantified41% of sites provided no response to the IYCF question. Of the 87 sites that responded, most identified implementing agencies rather than confirming an active programme. Only 24 sites gave a clear affirmative. IYCF needs should be assessed through a dedicated nutrition survey.
๐Ÿฝ๏ธ Meals per day โ€” host vs IDP households
Host HHIDP HH
๐Ÿ’ฐ Food prices โ€” now vs last year (NGN/mudu)
20252026
โš ๏ธ
Lower prices reflect supply disruption and reduced purchasing power โ€” not improved access. IDPs cannot afford food without income.
๐ŸŒฑ Agricultural readiness โ€” 2026 season
๐Ÿ‘ถ Nutrition services coverage
๐Ÿ 

Shelter & Non-Food Items (NFI)

Shelter conditions, NFI gaps, and the school double-use crisis across 147 sites

IDPs: Zero Shelter
8,947
Sleeping in open ยท fully exposed
Sites Using Tents
86
59% of sites ยท not a durable solution
Schools Used as Shelter
22
15% of sites ยท blocking education
Sites Needing NFI Kits
99%
145 of 147 โ€” all 5 categories
๐Ÿ˜๏ธ Shelter type distribution (sites)
๐Ÿ“ฆ NFI needs by category
NFI Kits
145 sites
Kitchen Sets
145 sites
Shelter Kits
145 sites
Emergency Shelter
145 sites
T-Shelter
145 sites
๐Ÿ”ด
Near-universal NFI gapAll 5 NFI categories needed at 99% of sites โ€” a system-wide supply failure requiring large-scale pipeline activation immediately.
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

Gender Equality & Protection

GBV, child protection, safety concerns, and help-seeking pathways across assessed communities

Sites Reporting GBV
94%
138 of 147 sites with valid data
Forced/Early Marriage
74%
109 of 147 sites ยท most prevalent GBV form
Child Labour Observed
44%
65 of 147 sites
Violence Against Children
40
sites reporting observed violence
๐Ÿ”ด
GBV is pervasive and severely under-servedGBV reported at 94% of sites. Forced/early marriage at 74% of all sites is the dominant form โ€” driven by poverty and breakdown of protective social structures. Survival sex at 17% of sites reflects acute economic desperation. Police used at only 4% of sites, clinics at 1.4% โ€” formal protection mechanisms are effectively absent.
โš ๏ธ GBV types reported at sites
๐Ÿ†˜ Help-seeking pathways for GBV
โš ๏ธ
Police = 6 sites (4%); clinics = 2 sites (1.4%). Combined formal pathway used at only 5.4% of sites. Community leaders and family are the de facto protection entry points.
๐Ÿ‘ฆ Child protection flags (sites)
๐Ÿ˜ฐ Safety concerns โ€” women & girls
๐Ÿฅ

Health

Disease burden, facility capacity, drug supply gaps, and maternal health indicators

Malaria Cases (7 days)
628
197 deaths ยท 31% case fatality rate
Diarrhoea CFR (7 days)
66%
105 cases ยท 69 deaths
Facilities: <1 Week Drugs
49%
65 of 133 facilities with supply data
Births: No Skilled Care
58%
283 of 484 births in 7 days
๐Ÿ”ด
Healthcare system collapse โ€” catastrophic case fatality ratesA 31% malaria CFR and 66% diarrhoea CFR are 30โ€“60ร— above emergency thresholds. People are dying from fully preventable, treatable diseases because no treatment is accessible. This is the defining indicator of a collapsed health system.
๐Ÿฆ  Disease cases vs deaths โ€” 7-day period
CasesDeaths
๐Ÿ’Š Drug supply at health facilities
๐Ÿคฐ Maternal health โ€” 7-day births
๐Ÿ’ฒ Service cost barriers
๐Ÿ“š

Education

School attendance, access barriers, gender parity, and teacher availability across assessed sites

Sites: Zero School Attendance
43%
63 of 147 sites ยท no children in school
Top Barrier: Fear of Attack
61
sites โ€” joint #1 barrier with no materials
No Learning Materials
61
sites โ€” joint #1 barrier
Girls Share of Enrolled
59.8%
3,193 girls vs 2,146 boys
๐Ÿ”ด
Fear of attack is the dominant education barrier โ€” not infrastructureFear of sending children to school is reported at 61 sites, tied with lack of materials (61 sites). "No school building" is reported at only 39 sites. Safe access and material provision must be prioritised alongside physical construction.
๐Ÿ“Š Education barriers โ€” sites reporting each reason
๐Ÿง’ Gender split โ€” enrolled children
โ„น๏ธ
Girls outnumber boys among enrolled students (59.8% vs 40.2%)Counterintuitive given pervasive forced marriage at 74% of sites. Boys may be disproportionately pulled into labour or conflict-related activities, or face greater security risks traveling to school. Education cluster partners should investigate this further.
๐Ÿ“‹ Education access summary
Indicator Count % of Sites Implication
Children attending school 77 sites 52% Girls: 3,193 (59.8%) ยท Boys: 2,146 (40.2%)
No school attendance at all 63 sites 43% Complete education blackout โ€” multi-barrier response required
Fear of attack โ€” top barrier 61 sites 41% School safety and community confidence-building are as critical as buildings
No learning materials โ€” top barrier 61 sites 41% Material procurement and distribution urgently needed
No school building 39 sites 27% Real gap, but not the dominant barrier
No teachers 37 sites 25% Teacher deployment and incentive schemes required
Schools used as IDP shelter 22 sites 15% T-shelter construction needed to free these spaces โ€” dual intervention
๐Ÿ—๏ธ

Infrastructure Damage

Damage status across all key public facilities โ€” schools, hospitals, roads, boreholes, and markets

โš ๏ธ
Infrastructure damage compounds every other sector gapRoughly half of all key facilities are partially damaged; 5โ€“7% are totally destroyed. Partially damaged hospitals with depleted drug stocks have no operational capacity. Damaged boreholes in areas with fecal contamination directly worsen the disease picture. Damaged roads impede every humanitarian supply chain.
Schools โ€” Total Destruction
10
sites ยท 7% ยท 48% partial damage
Hospitals โ€” Total Destruction
9
sites ยท 6% ยท 47% partial damage
Boreholes โ€” Total Destruction
10
sites ยท 7% ยท 49% partial damage
Roads โ€” Total Destruction
7
sites ยท 5% ยท 49% partial damage
๐Ÿ—๏ธ Infrastructure damage โ€” stacked by type
๐Ÿ“‹ Damage breakdown by facility
Facility Intact Partial Destroyed Risk Level
Public schools 64 (45%) 69 (48%) 10 (7%) HIGH
General hospitals 67 (47%) 68 (47%) 9 (6%) CRITICAL
Access roads 66 (46%) 70 (49%) 7 (5%) HIGH
Boreholes 63 (44%) 70 (49%) 10 (7%) CRITICAL
Open markets 66 (46%) 69 (48%) 8 (6%) MEDIUM

๐Ÿ’š The Case for Investing in CASI's Borno Response

Care Aid Support Initiative is headquartered in Maiduguri, Borno State โ€” inside the crisis zone. With operational partnerships across IOM, WFP, ICRC, and IMC, and a mandate centred on women, children, and IDPs, CASI delivers integrated, community-trusted response across Kaga and Damboa LGAs.

~893,000
People in acute need
Total assessed population
8,947
IDPs with zero shelter
Emergency response needed now
94%
Farmers without seeds
2026 food crisis prevention window
197
Malaria deaths in 7 days
Preventable with drugs & LLINs
๐Ÿ“Š Response gap โ€” need vs current coverage
๐ŸŽฏ Priority funding matrix
Intervention Target Urgency
Emergency seed & agriculture inputs 10,000+ farming HHs Critical
Malaria LLIN + artemisinin drugs 147 sites Critical
Emergency shelter kits 8,947+ IDPs Critical
NFI kits (all 5 categories) 145 sites Critical
GBV safe spaces + case management 138 sites Critical
CMAM scale-up (SAM treatment) 72 sites without CMAM High
Drug supply chain restoration 65 facilities <1wk stock High
T-shelter to free schools 22 sites High
Documentation support Sites with 54% no-doc rate High
School safety + materials 61 sites (fear barrier) High
WASH โ€” latrines + hygiene 41 contaminated sites High
CCCM site management 147 sites Medium
๐Ÿ“ž
Partner with CASIContact Care Aid Support Initiative to discuss funding, co-programming, or field visits: careaidsupportinitiative.org/contact-us ยท +234 812 191 3938 ยท Maiduguri, Borno State. We welcome sub-grants, pooled funding, joint assessments, and technical co-implementation.